Demographic and social-cultural dynamics on access to safe sanitation in pastoral communities: a case of Saku Sub-County, Marsabit, Kenya

Authors

  • Marcus Labaru Chichia Meru University of Science and Technology
  • Lilian Mukiri Kirimi Meru University of Science and Technology
  • Jane Kawira Mberia Meru University of Science and Technology
  • Grace Kasiva Eliud Meru University of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58506/ajstss.v4i2.256

Keywords:

Cultural, Demographic, Social, Pastoral Communities, Safely Managed Sanitation

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agenda 6.2 aim for universal access to safely managed sanitation by 2030 and also emphasizes eradication of open defecation as a way to promote pathogen-free environment. Despite efforts to improve sanitation standards, significant challenges still persist, particularly in developing regions inhabited by pastoral communities and could be linked to unique components in the society. This study investigated the influence of demographic and social-cultural factors on access to safely managed sanitation in pastoral communities of Saku Sub-County, Kenya, where sanitation access is notably low. A cross-sectional descriptive design was employed. Semi-structured questionnaires were used to collect data from a sample of 100 household heads, calculated using Yamane’s adjusted formular. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 in descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings showed that gender roles were significant predictors of toilet adoption at the households (β=0.138, p=0.01). The nature of work for women such as having to look for water and for men like herding in lonely places where there were no toilets attracted open defecation cases. Latrine utilization was minimal at night due to safety concerns among females as indicated by 72% of the respondents. The cultural beliefs held in the region had a negative influence on toilet adoption (β=-0.130, p=0.040) while level of awareness on sanitation-related matters among the residents positively influenced adoption of safe toilets, thus increased access to safe sanitation (β=0.127, p=0.011). Construction of toilets near some households was undermined by the fear that the toilet pits would kill or injure livestock, which seemed to be given the highest priority. Traditions that revolved around restriction of latrine sharing between grown-ups and children attracted cases of open defecation even with access to toilets which suggested a need for toilets separation. The study recommended exploration of different context-appropriate mechanisms for triggering behaviour change to enhance sanitation standards among pastoral communities. An assessment of demographic characteristics, social and cultural practices prior to implementation of sanitation solutions, along with stakeholder involvement, could help in spotting any drawbacks towards ownership, uptake and sustainability of sanitation solutions.

References

Akter, J., Islam, M. R., Akter, S., Rahman, M. M., Hossain, F., Anam, M. R., ... & Rashid, S. (2022). Equity in access to safely managed sanitation and prevalence of diarrheal diseases in Bangladesh: a national and sub-national analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases, 22(1), 1-8.

Alhassan, A., & Anyarayor, B. K. (2018). Determinants of adoption of open defecation-free (ODF) innovations: A case study of Nadowli-Kaleo district, Ghana. Journal of Development and Communication Studies, 5(2), 54-69.

Bhatt, N., Budhathoki, S. S., Lucero-Prisno, D. E. I., Shrestha, G., Bhattachan, M., Thapa, J., ... & Pokharel, P. K. (2019). What motivates open defecation? A qualitative study from a rural setting in Nepal. PloS one, 14(7), e0219246.

Busienei, P. J., Ogendi, G. M., & Mokua, M. A. (2019). Open defecation practices in Lodwar, Kenya: a mixed-methods research. Environmental health insights, 13, 1178630219828370.

Caruso, B. A., Clasen, T. F., Hadley, C., Yount, K. M., Haardörfer, R., Rout, M., ... & Cooper, H. L. (2017). Understanding and defining sanitation insecurity: women’s gendered experiences of urination, defecation and menstruation in rural Odisha, India. BMJ global health, 2(4), e000414.

Donacho, D. O., Tucho, G. T., & Hailu, A. B. (2022). Households' access to safely managed sanitation facility and its determinant factors in Jimma town, Ethiopia. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 12(2), 217-226.

Dwipayanti, N. M. U., Rutherford, S., & Chu, C. (2019). Cultural determinants of sanitation uptake and sustainability: local values and traditional roles in rural Bali, Indonesia. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 9(3), 438-449.

Ellis, A., McClintic, E. E., Awino, E. O., Caruso, B. A., Arriola, K. R., Ventura, S. G., ... & Freeman, M. C. (2020). Practices and perspectives on latrine use, child feces disposal, and clean play environments in western Kenya. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 102(5), 1094.

Girmay, A. M., Alemu, Z. A., Mengesha, S. D., Dinssa, D. A., Wagari, B., Weldegebriel, M. G., ... & Tollera, G. (2022). Effect of demographic disparities on the use of the JMP ladders for water, sanitation, and hygiene services in Bishoftu Town, Ethiopia. Discover Water, 2(1), 8.

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (KNBS). (2019). Kenya Populations and Households census data, (2)

Khanna, T., & Das, M. (2016). Why gender matters in the solution towards safe sanitation? Reflections from rural India. Global public health, 11(10), 1185-1201.

Maliti, E. (2021). Evolution of open defecation prevalence in Tanzania 2002–2015: evidence from national demographic and health surveys. Development in Practice, 31(1), 112-124

McMichael, C. (2018). Toilet talk: eliminating open defecation and improved sanitation in Nepal. Medical Anthropology, 37(4), 294-310

Mulenga, J. N., Bwalya, B. B., & Chishimba, K. K. (2017). Determinants and inequalities in access to improved water sources and sanitation among the Zambian households.

Njuguna, J., & Muruka, C. (2017). Open defecation in newly created Kenyan counties: a situational analysis. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved, 28(1), 71-78.

Paul, B., Jean Simon, D., Kiragu, A., Généus, W., & Emmanuel, E. (2022). Socio-economic and demographic factors influencing open defecation in Haiti: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1-16.

Temesgen A, Molla Adane M, Birara A, Shibabaw T (2021) Having a latrine facility is not a guarantee for eliminating open defecation owing to socio-demographic and environmental factors: The case of Machakel district in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 16(9): e0257813. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0257813

UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html

Wasonga, J., Okowa, M., & Kioli, F. (2016). Sociocultural determinants to adoption of safe water, sanitation, and hygiene practices in Nyakach, Kisumu County, Kenya: a descriptive qualitative study. Journal of Anthropology, 2016.

WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Program. (2023). Update report, Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2022: Special focus on gender

World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Fact sheet on sanitation. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sanitation

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis. No. HA29 Y2 1967

Downloads

Published

2026-01-21

How to Cite

Chichia, M. L., Kirimi, L. M., Mberia, J. K., & Eliud, G. K. (2026). Demographic and social-cultural dynamics on access to safe sanitation in pastoral communities: a case of Saku Sub-County, Marsabit, Kenya. African Journal of Science, Technology and Social Sciences, 4(2), SS 156–165. https://doi.org/10.58506/ajstss.v4i2.256

Most read articles by the same author(s)