Evaluation of onsite Sanitation Technologies using a Shit Flow Diagram at Iten Municipality Elgeiyo-Marakwet, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58506/ajstss.v4i2.224Keywords:
Onsite Sanitation Technologies, Evaluation, Shit Flow Diagram, Public Health, Human Excreta managementAbstract
Ensuring access to safe sanitation in developing countries remains a significant challenge, contributing to public health and environmental problems. Although various interventions have been implemented to tackle these issues, their effectiveness in managing human excreta along the sanitation service chain is still uncertain. This study aimed to assess onsite sanitation technologies in Iten Municipality by utilizing a shit flow diagram (SFD). A mixed method approach was employed, involving quantitative and qualitative data collection. A sample size of 388 household heads was determined using the Yamane formula and selected through a cluster random proportionate sampling technique. Quantitative data was gathered via household survey, while qualitative data was obtained through key informant interviews, site visits, and transect walks. The quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS version 26, while qualitative data was organized into themes and presented in narrative form. The Susana platform and the SFD tools facilitated further data analysis and the creation of the shit flow diagram. The findings revealed that the primary onsite sanitation technologies in Iten are pit latrines (69.1%), septic tanks (22.9%), and anaerobic digesters (2.9%). The study identified hygiene issues and found that approximately 64.6% of onsite systems malfunctioned. Additionally, about 31% of execrate was inadequately managed, including pits and tanks that were not emptied, overflowing, leaking, or discharging into the environment (15%), emptied but not delivered to treatment (11%), fecal sludge and supernatant delivered to treatment but not treated (1%), and open defecation (3%). The onsite sanitation technologies in the municipality face considerable challenges, underscoring the need for better management and regulations. The study recommends enhancing sanitation infrastructure, implementing standardized maintenance protocols, and providing community education to improve waste management and public health outcomes.
References
Almansa, X. F., Starostka, R., Raskin, L., Zeeman, G., De Los Reyes III, F., Waechter, J., ... & Radu, T. (2023). Anaerobic Digestion as a Core Technology in Addressing the Global Sanitation Crisis: Challenges and Opportunities. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(48), 19078-19087. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05291
Bautista Angeli, J. R., Morales, A., LeFloc’h, T., Lakel, A., & Andres, Y. (2018). Anaerobic digestion and Integration at urban scale: Feedback and comparative case study. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0170-3
Berendes, D., Kirby, A., Clennon, J. A., Raj, S., Yakubu, H., Leon, J., Robb, K., Kartikeyan, A., Hemavathy, P., Gunasekaran, A., Ghale, B., Kumar, J. S., Mohan, V. R., Kang, G., & Moe, C. (2017). The Influence of Household- and Community-Level Sanitation and Fecal Sludge Management on Urban Fecal Contamination in Household. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0170
Chambers, K. G., Sheridan, P. M., & Cook, S. M. (2022). Sanitation Criteria: A Comprehensive Review of Existing Sustainability and Resilience Evaluation Criteria for Sanitation Systems. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 9(7), 583-591.
Forbis-Stokes, A. A., O'Meara, P. F., Mugo, W., Simiyu, G. M., & Deshusses, M. A. (2016). Onsite Fecal Sludge Treatment with the Anaerobic Digestion Pasteurization Latrine. Environmental Engineering Science, 33(11), 898-906. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0148
Furlong, C. (2015). Shit Flow Diagram Report for Kisumu, Kenya. SFD Promotion Initiative and the Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC), Kisumu, Kenya.
Hall, C., Crookston, B., West, J., Linehan, M., McGahey, C., Wendo, D., & Abdi, A. (2021). Systems Thinking and Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: Examples from Kenya's Afya Jijini Program. Health, 13(7), 694-704. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2021.137053
Herrera, V. (2019). Reconciling Global Aspirations and Local Realities: Challenges Facing the Sustainable Development Goals for Water and Sanitation. World Development, 118, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.02.009
Hussain, F., Clasen, T., Akter, S., Bawel, V., Luby, S. P., Leontsini, E., ... & Winch, P. J. (2017). Advantages And Limitations for Users of Double Pit Pour-Flush Latrines: A Qualitative Study In Rural Bangladesh. Bmc Public Health, 17(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4412-7
Jenkins, M. W., Cumming, O., & Cairncross, S. (2014). Pit Latrine Emptying Behavior and Demand for Sanitation Services in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(7), 6965-6981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120302588
JMP. (2020). Regional analysis | JMP. https://washdata.org/how-we-work/country-and-regional-engagement/regional-analysis-2021
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) (2019). Kenya Population and Housing Census
Kwiringira, J. N., Kabumbuli, R., Zakumumpa, H., Mugisha, J., Akugizibwe, M., Ariho, P., & Rujumba, J. (2021). Re-Conceptualizing Sustainable Urban Sanitation in Uganda: Why the Roots Of 'Slumification'must Be Dealt With. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 992. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11029-8
Nakagiri, A., Niwagaba, C. B., Nyenje, P. M., Kulabako, R. N., Tumuhairwe, J. B., & Kansiime, F. (2015). Are Pit Latrines in Urban Areas of Sub-Saharan Africa Performing? A Review of Usage, Filling, Insects and Odour Nuisances. BMC Public Health, 16, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2772-z
Nelson, K. L., & Murray, A. (2008). Sanitation for Unserved Populations: Technologies, Implementation Challenges, And Opportunities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 119-151. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.022007.145142
Omonei, R.K. (2019). Iten Municipality Integrated Development Plan.
Panesar, A., Walther, D., Kauter-Eby, T., Bieker, S., Rohilla, S., Dube, R., ... & Schertenleib, R. (2022). The Susana Platform and the Shit Flow Diagram: Tools to Achieve More Sustainable Sanitation for All. A Better World, 2018(3), 40. http://cdn.cseindia.org/attachments/0.71887700_1521624726_shit-flow-diagram.pdf
Peal, A., Evans, B., Ahilan, S., Ban, R., Blackett, I., Hawkins, P., ... & Veses, O. (2020). Estimating Safely Managed Sanitation In Urban Areas; Lessons Learned from a Global Implementation of Excreta-Flow Diagrams. Frontiers In Environmental Science, 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00001
Peletz, R., MacLeod, C., Kones, J., Samuel, E., Easthope-Frazer, A., Delaire, C., & Khush, R. (2020). When pits fill up: Supply and Demand for Safe Pit-Emptying Services in Kisumu,
Kenya. PLoS One, 15(9), e0238003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238003
SFD-PI. (2018c). SFD Manual Volume 1 and 2. https://sfd.susana.org/news-events/news/96-sfd-manual-volume-1-and-2-version-2-0
Simiyu, S. (2017). Preference For and Characteristics of an Appropriate Sanitation Technology for the Slums of Kisumu, Kenya. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 9(3), 300-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2017.1325366
Tilley, E., Ulrich, L., Lüthi, C., Reymond, P., & Zurbrügg, C. (2014). Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies.
Tilmans, S., Russel, K., Sklar, R., Page, L., Kramer, S., & Davis, J. (2015). Container-Based Sanitation: Assessing Costs and Effectiveness of Excreta Management in Cap Haitien, Haiti. Environment And Urbanization, 27(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815572746
UNICEF, WHO. (2020). Billions Of People Will Lack Access to Safe Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene in 2030 Unless Progress Quadruples – Warn WHO and UNICEF. https://www.who.int/news/item/01-07-2021-billions-of-people-will-lack-access-to-safe-water-sanitation-and-hygiene-in-2030-unless-progress-quadruples-warn-who-unicef
Varma, V. C., Rathinam, R., Suresh, V., Naveen, S., Satishkumar, P., Abdulrahman, I. S., ... & Kumar, J. A. (2023). Urban Waste Water Management Paradigm Evolution: Decentralization, Resource Recovery, and Water Reclamation and Reuse. Environmental Quality Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.22109
Vidal, B., Hedström, A., Barraud, S., Kärrman, E., & Herrmann, I. (2019). Assessing the Sustainability of Onsite Sanitation Systems Using Multi-Criteria Analysis. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 5(9), 1599-1615.
Weststrate, J., Dijkstra, G., Eshuis, J., Gianoli, A., & Rusca, M. (2019). The Sustainable Development Goal on Water and Sanitation: Learning from the Millennium Development Goals. Social Indicators Research, 143, 795-810. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11205-018-1965-5
World Bank. (2019). Providing Sustainable Sanitation and Water Services to Low-Income Communities in Nairobi. https://www.worldbank.org/
